PLAN B FOR NASA

2+2=4 is the energy equation for the unviverses.I do mean plural because a big crunch must preceed the big bang to make sense out of it.
After all it is the conversion of potential energy to kinetic.
And what we need is a way to store that energy.
When the four states of matter are one and a contradiction in mathematical terms.
Then the potential energy from the big crunch is stored.
And when the one state of matter becomes four again the potential energy is released as kinetic.
And thus there is a big bang.
Maybe this can or cannot be reproduced in the lab as conditions may not be the same in our present universe as they were before the big bang.
If we can store infinite amounts of energy using this primordial sink.
Then we can power starships or the next generation motor car.
The motor car would be powered by a supercritical non newtonian fluid battery.
But what would make the starship go maybe supercritical non newtonian plutonium or some exotic material like that.
A contradictory maths applies to the Godel universe where time is contradictory.
So we make the big crunch a Godel universe just to be positivist.
And to get the maths that we want from a model.
The contradictory Godel universe gives rise to a big crunch that is contradictory.
1/3 Liquid+ 1/3 Solid+ 1/3 Gas= 1 Solid/Liquid/Gas.
And this results in a non contradictory big bang.
Which means the math in our universe is understandable Godel would like this.
And predictable and adds up it is non contradictory.
Whiteheads Principia Mathematica argues for math that is non contradictory.
The question of the energy equation for the two universe is one that cannot be answered.
And it can be answered.
Two universes must balance for E=MC^2.
2E=2M*2C^2 And they must add up to 4 2+2=4.
The equation for mass and energy doesn't balance.Now this is where I could have it wrong.
But a Little energy is lost in conversion in the big bang the conversion of mass to energy so that 2+2 does not equal four.
The further back in time we cycle the more energy is lost to time.
So that 2+2=3 can be true at one point on the graph.
If 2+2=3 is right for the big bang Principia is wrong for origins.
We might as well throw away the text book and write a new one.
But wait a moment what if we reverse the math for a contradictory in time balck hole in a Godel universe we get a non contradictory big bang.
And that is the math that makes sense to the matematicians.
That is reasonable evidence and that is inadmissable.
It is inadmissable because I say 2+2=4 balances when we fetch a bale of water from dimension X nihilo.
We fetch a bale of energy to balance the equation.
Now this isn't evolution.
But for evolution we must propose that light speed increases with every cycle just so much that the unvierse is a little more massive as we go backward in time.
And as a result mass becomes infinite when time is forever.
This is a paradox one of those that proves Erasmus Darwins theory of the evolution of the universe wrong.
If you can find another way to balance the loss of energy than making the universe more massive as you go back in time lets hear it.
Of course it is a straw man because nobody believes Erasmus anymore but the big bang is the creation of energy..
Which is against the laws of thermodynamics and thus of evolution.
So you cannot create a universe by evolution you have to resort to creation ex-nihilo.
The big bang is thus a new source of energy that can power the world.
You can store any sort of energy.
And release it all at once.
Maybe it would make a great laser if we could store light in one state and let it become four states.
But that is just conjecture.
Particle X and Y cannot be in the same place at the same time in the same state EXCEPT BEFORE THE BIG BANG AND MAYBE IN CERN.
Cern can confirm that Bose Einstein and fermis dirac statistics can be added in 1/3s.
1/3 BOSE EINSTEIN STATS+ 1/3 FERMI DIRAC STATS+ 1/3 FERMI DIRAC STATS= 1 BOSE EINSTIEN/FERMI DIRAC STATS.
This doesn't make sense mathematically since APPLES CAN"T BE ADDED TO ORANGES AND GET ONE IN OUR UNIVERSE.
But before the big bang they can be added to get one.
This is a prediction of a new type of particle which CERN will detect.
The particle that is the mechanism for the big bang.
The worker particle I call it.
Because it actually does the work of the unviverse.
Nothing could please me more if you would write Stephen jeffreys wrong and prove me wrong.
This isn't true I would like to be right.
But we will learn something from CERN if my predictions are wrong.
The universe may well be a stranger place than we can imagine.
Narcissus is the root of all evil.
And there is nothing as bad as Narcissus.
he the demon behind it all.
And he is juts ourselves just our own love of self.
And maybe there is a postive side to our love of self.
And there is we can love God too.
If we can love oursleves.
And it is isn't easy to be Narcissus in a world that hates him.
And is is easy to be hated.
And that is why everybody wants to love themselves.
CERN EVERY CLOWN HAS AN OPINION.
And that is what Iam writing for everyone to see.
Because CERN has an opinion about every clown.
And they down.
They are all clowns and maybe everyone who isn't CERN is a clown.
So send them in to CERN send in the clowns.
And that is a great idea There should be clowns.
Send them in to CERN.
Where are the clowns they certainly are not at CERN.
All I can say is there should be clowns then everybody will laugh.
And that is the main thing anyway.
And it is.